Talk:Main Page

Layout

• Looks good, have you decided who is going to be responsible for updating it every week (or however often you update it)? --Drunky 18:11, 21 Jan 2006 (PST)

• Not yet. --Dws90 18:12, 21 Jan 2006 (PST)

• WTF? Why did you add it now and not wait until Scottie fixed it?! *sigh* And I don't see why we each can't edit something... --Vgg91 18:12, 21 Jan 2006 (PST)

• Why not add it now? We can still do slight tweaks to the content as is needed, but its certainly in a presentable form at the moment. --Dws90 18:14, 21 Jan 2006 (PST)

• Meh. Whatever, I still think you should wait for Scottie. Anyhow, I think maybe it would look better if the Featured Article was at the top since thats really what'll be looked at the most. --Vgg91 18:17, 21 Jan 2006 (PST)

• Listen, if you are going to keep a theme of the week, update it EVERY week. --VidGameFreak 05:49, 13 March 2006 (PST)

• Hey, im not complaining, but how about you change it to theme of the month, so you guys don't have too much work on your hands updating it every week, I realize it is hard work to do all this. Or, you could just change it so it says theme of March, or theme of April, etc... Just a suggestion. --VidGameFreak 06:18, 24 March 2006 (PST)

  That means there would be only 12 themes in a year. That's pretty...pitiful. --Scottie_theNerd 06:28, 24 March 2006 (PST)

• What about something that gives some more free space like "Theme of the Moment" or something like that? --Total Lost 06:44, 24 March 2006 (PST)
• I recommend we call it "Theme of the Century". Any extra ones we slip in can then be considered bonuses! --Dws90 06:48, 24 March 2006 (PST)
• "Theme of Until-We-Get-Around-To-It". --ZombieJeff 15:50, 31 March 2006 (PST)
• I think that the CE Reloaded news post doesn't fit. I don't see how it can be accidental. Deliberatly(sp) is a better word. ~~nice day3
• Ok. Better now? --Vgg91 13:27, 15 June 2006 (EDT)
• It was accidental, as the board owner didn't intend for it to happen. Obviously the rogue admin didn't accidentally boot those users, but the point is that for people reading the link to know that they weren't booted for something intentional, such as clearing inactive people.--Ricky Williams 16:44, 15 June 2006 (EDT)

New Users

• I changed the system, now you have to have an account to edit, but you can freely make your own accounts. --Drunky 14:25, 22 Jan 2006 (PST)
  • I just tried to make an account for a friend, and there's no option. Is this an error because of this new system, or is it there and I'm just dumb as a post? MMH 08:27, 4 March 2007 (EST)

About the two most recent blocks..

• If what used to happen to Wikipedia applies here, I think we can expect to get swamped with advertising bots within the next few days. Perhaps we should try the "enter garbled phrase shown above if new links are being added" method to stop it before it starts? Oh, well, it's just an idea.--Hoshigaki Kisame 21:20, 4 July 2007 (EDT)

• Registrations already been disabled. I dont know how they're getting through. Its possible they create accounts dozens at a time and burn them off. --Drunky 00:33, 5 July 2007 (EDT)

• The ads are back...--FrozenTime 22:29, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Updates...

Time for a weekly article update. --Axel 11:49, 15 October 2007 (EDT)

where does it say weekly? --Vgg91 (talk • contribs) 16:34, 15 October 2007 (EDT)

It did used to... Right??? --Axel 20:53, 16 October 2007 (EDT)

• It was last labelled as "weekly" before August. I can't remember the last time it was actually changed weekly, if ever. --Demi Zenith 04:19, 17 October 2007 (EDT)

Meh, you know what you're talking about, I just meddle with minor things on the site that I notice. But regardless the article should be changed, it's been 16 days. --Axel 21:07, 20 October 2007 (EDT)

Roo

• Where is an Easter Roo? :o --Vgg91 (talk • contribs) 06:18, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Account requesting link

• Because the account requesting topic was locked, should the main page be changed? --Guwa 22:33, 23 October 2008 (EDT)
• Changed. --Vgg91 (talk • contribs) 04:18, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Massive Edits needed

• the main page needs to be changed, as well as like half the articles need to be updated... we should really get on this... I mean links to MBHS? christ that board hasnt been open to anyone in well over a year. >_>--TRC 09:58, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
• Go ahead, no one is stopping you from changing it.--Vgg91 (talk • contribs) 16:37, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

• i just wanted to ask permission first before messing with site pages. >_>--TRC 00:47, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

• eh, I'm going to wait for Drunkys input, because I think the Roo should be removed, as well as several links to MBHS, the MBHS archive should be replaced with a link to the GameFAQs archive, etc...--TRC 01:08, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Interview with a Moderator returns with Philz20.

…over a year ago. I'd think it can be removed. -guwa 03:40, 11 June 2010 (UTC)